EDITORIALS 2003
(Continued)
___________________________________
The
U.S. War Against Iraq
US rampage through
Baghdad kills thousands
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/bagd-a07.shtml
Washington's colonial regime in waiting for Baghdad
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/iraq-a07.shtml
US bases in Germany critical to assault on Iraq
Schroeder government complicit in war
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/germ-a07.shtml
Britain: Blair government announces near doubling of budget for war vs. Iraq
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/brit-a07.shtml
More antiwar demonstrations throughout Europe
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/euro-a07.shtml
Toronto marchers denounce slaughter in Iraq
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/toro-a07.shtml
News & Analysis
------------------------------------------
Western governments cut aid to Balkans
One millions refugees remain from 1990s wars
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/balk-a07.shtml
Correspondence
------------------------------------------
Letters on the war against Iraq
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/corr-a07.shtml
New in Russian
--------------------------------------------
Mirovoy Sozialistichesky Web Site provodit mezhdunarodnuju konferenziju po
voprosu o sozializme i voyne protiv voyny
http://www.wsws.org/ru/2003/apr2003/annc-a07.shtml
©World Socialist Web Site
___________________________________
More from WORLD SOCIALIST WEB SITE
A spectacle of
filth and reaction
New York union
gangsters celebrate slaughter in Iraq
By the Editorial Board
12 April 2003
In a celebration of slaughter, some 10,000 union construction workers were assembled April 10 at ground zero, the site of the fallen World Trade Center towers, to demonstrate in support of the Bush administration’s illegal war in Iraq.
The rally was organized by the Building and Construction Trades Council of Greater New York, an umbrella group that includes carpenters, painters, operating engineers, ironworkers and other construction unions. Workers were brought directly from job sites by the union to mill around while Republican politicians and union bureaucrats delivered speeches in support of the US war. American Flags were passed out, but there were few signs. Chants consisted largely of USA, USA, USA!
This spectacle of corruption, ignorance and reaction was trumpeted by the media as the largest pro-war rally yet even though it was less than a fifth the size promised by union organizers. It was given far more coverage than a demonstration last month that saw at least 50 times as many people march 30 blocks down Broadway to condemn the aggression against Iraq. Voice of America and the international wire services and news networks spread the images of the rally around the world, proclaiming them as proof that the American labor movement supports the president and his war.
While no doubt the administration sees great political value in these images, they no more capture the real mood of the working class than those of the staged toppling of Saddam Hussein’s statue reveal the real state of affairs in Baghdad. If anything, the event in lower Manhattan was another verification that a corrupt, anticommunist trade union bureaucracy has over the course of several decades completely destroyed the American labor movement as an institution that in any sense represents the interests of American workers.
It has also served to further disprove the fanciful claims of various Left organizations that the official union hierarchy had somehow reformed itself and become a bastion of antiwar sentiment. Because of their peculiar history and backward craft union tradition, the construction trades are among the most reactionary of American unions. Nevertheless, the entire AFL-CIO has lined up in support of the invasion and occupation of Iraq.
The rally was organized on the basis of lies. The first was contained in the leaflet issued by the Trades Council calling on its members to show your support for our men and women serving in the armed forces. The rally was not one of solidarity with the predominantly working class and poor youth who join the military to get a job or education. No one asked them if they wanted to invade Iraq. It was organized in support of the criminal policy undertaken by the Bush administration.
No speaker bothered to mention the Bush administration’s cuts in Veterans benefits or the plight of more than 200,000 veterans of the first Gulf War who are suffering disabilities as a result of their exposure to toxic chemicals and depleted uranium in that intervention. It would have been more honest to call the demonstration a Sacrifice Our Troops Rally.
Secondly, the site for this event was deliberately chosen to promote the lie that the invasion of Iraq was somehow justified by the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. The politicians and bureaucrats hypocritically exploited the deaths of nearly 3,000 people there to whip up support for the murder of tens, if not hundreds of thousands, of civilians and soldiers in Iraq.
From the bellicose rhetoric spewed from the speaker’s platform, no one would ever know that none of the alleged hijackers who flew the two passenger jets into the Twin Towers were Iraqis. Nor would they guess that the Bush administration itself was forced to acknowledge that the Baghdad regime had nothing to do with the attack.
It is particularly lamentable that a handful of firefighters turned out in their bunker gear for the affair. Having lost 343 of their members in the catastrophe of September 11, the firefighter unions have never demanded an independent investigation to determine who really was responsible for what happened that day. Rather, they have accepted the lie that attacking Iraq evens the score.
The war started here on September 11, 2001, New York Governor George Pataki told the crowd, adding the bizarre suggestion that Saddam Hussein’s statutes should be melted down and turned into girders for new construction on the site.
Patrick Lynch, the president of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association, one of the other unions participating in the rally, managed to turn the old slogan of labor solidarity, “An injury to one is an injury to all, into a justification for the massacre of women and children in a virtually defenseless country. “We are sending a message to the world: “You attack one of us, you attack all of us. And we attack back!”, he bellowed.
Lynch also denounced antiwar demonstrators for what he claimed were violent acts against cops. New York City police have brutalized protesters, subjecting many to beatings, false arrests and illegal interrogations.
But the biggest lie of all was the pretense that those on the platform as well as their audience of workers, including those who were bribed, intimidated or fatally intoxicated with the jingoism promoted by the media somehow represent the American working class and the workers, in particular, of New York City, one of the most concentrated centers of antiwar sentiment in the country.
In both its tone and content, the rally recalled the infamous hard-hat demonstration dubbed Bloody Friday May 1970, when hundreds of wrench-wielding construction workers attacked antiwar demonstrators at New York City Hall. The demonstrators were protesting the National Guard killing of students at Kent State University. The union-organized mob moved on to randomly bludgeon students at nearby Pace University. Seventy-five people were injured seriously enough to require hospitalization.
Later that month, Peter Brennan, who was then the head of the city’s Building and Construction Trades Council, the same outfit that organized Thursday’s rally, led a Support the Troops march of tens of thousands down Fifth Avenue.
While the construction bureaucrats claimed then that both the violent assaults and the march were spontaneous, they were anything but. These actions were jointly sponsored by the union officials and the construction bosses. Workers who participated got paid, while those who didn’t were docked for the day.
It later emerged that Brennan had organized the gangster attacks and the demonstrations at the behest of the Nixon administration, which was outraged and frightened by the growing movement against the war in Vietnam. Brennan was rewarded for his services with an appointment as secretary of labor, a post he held from 1973 until shortly after his benefactor was forced to resign in disgrace.
The present head of the Building and Construction Trades Council, Edward Malloy, is cut from the same cloth as Brennan. If anything, the union group has grown even more reactionary and corrupt over the past 30 years, and more directly subordinated to the interests of the employers and the government.
Former senator and failed Republican presidential candidate Robert Dole, known for his sarcasm, told the crowd, “Some call Saddam’s rule a gangster regime, but that would be an insult to gangsters.” The construction bureaucrats on the platform no doubt appreciated the Senator’s remark. Many of them have been indicted for racketeering, charged with taking Mafia kickbacks for creating No-show jobs and allowing cheaper nonunion labor to be used on so-called union construction sites.
There is a clear and present danger that this gangster leadership will attempt to replicate the kind of vicious attacks on opponents of the government seen during the Vietnam War era. Like their Peronist counterparts in the Argentine unions of the 1970s, this bureaucracy is prepared to act as a bulwark of fascist reaction and dictatorship.
The union officialdom actions are completely opposed to the genuine interests of workers in New York City and the US as a whole. As the rally was unfolding at the Ground Zero, several blocks away the City Billionaire mayor, Michael Bloomberg, and his aides were putting the finishing touches on a budget that will impose the full burden of the collapse in revenues from Wall Street onto the backs of the city’s workers. Up to 15,000 layoffs are predicted along with sharp cuts in basic services.
Newsday columnist Jimmy Breslin, a lonely, angry voice in a media otherwise given to the glorification of US militarism, drew the real connection between the war in Iraq and the mounting attacks on the working class in New York City in a column published earlier this week entitled, Bombs Away, and Poor Pay. Pointing to the million-dollar price tag on cruise missiles fired at Iraq, he wrote:
They see them on television, night
and day, a nation’s treasure exploding in the sky, glowing, white smoke against
a night sky, shooting from an aircraft carrier at sea and then, soon, here are
the explosions in Iraq, Baghdad mostly, lighting up the night sky. A million-dollar
show. School teachers fly in the explosion. Single mothers who learned how to
operate a computer. Clerks in a welfare office. The missiles going through a
sky that is undefended, aiming with precision at a small country that has no
missiles that can reach any distance, not one plane in the air, and has been
firing anti-aircraft at American planes for over 10 years now and hasn’t
brought one down.
Workers who participate in reactionary events
like the rally at the World Trade Center site, whether because they are paid or
intimidated, should be ashamed of themselves. It is not just an afternoon off
to shout and drink beer. Their actions serve to discredit the American working
class internationally, divide it from its class brothers in other lands and
fatally undermine the ability of workers in this country to wage any
independent struggle against the attacks on jobs, living standards and basic
democratic rights.
Such demonstrations will only assist the Bush administration in using war and militarism as the justification for escalating the attacks on the conditions of American working people and speeding up the transfer of more and more wealth into the hands of the corporate oligarchy. The cost of war and occupation will be paid for through even more severe austerity policies and longer unemployment lines.
For the bureaucrats like the AFL-CIO’s John Sweeney, the Teamsters, Jimmy Hoffa or Malloy and Co. of the Building and Construction Trades Council, this is not a problem. They have presided for many years over the decimation of the jobs and rights of the members they purport to represent in return for increased privileges and closer relations with the employers and politicians. Some of them no doubt hope that by howling out their patriotic support for Bush they will earn credit with the Justice Department on pending criminal indictments.
The war in Iraq marks the onset of a new period of profound crisis and shocks for working people in the US and internationally. The ability of American workers to defend their interests under these conditions depends upon their ability to cast off the reactionary domination of the AFL-CIO. Entirely new organizations of industrial and political struggle must be built that are independent of and opposed to this degenerate and bureaucratized apparatus.
Above all, the revival of a
genuine workers movement in America requires a new perspective, implacably
opposed to the fascistic nationalism of the labor bureaucracy. This perspective
must be based upon the political independence and international unity of the
working class and the struggle for socialism.
How
and why the US encouraged looting in Iraq
"A rapacious colonial war":
Interview with Arab journalist Said Dudin on US bombing of Al Jazeera
American "free press" in action
US networks agree to serve as Pentagon propaganda tool in Iraq
International protests against the US-led war
on Iraq
Copyright 1998-2003
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
See
All the Little Piggy’s line up at the trough…
EVEN BOURGEOIS PRESS ADMITS COMPLICITY BETWEEN
U.S. WAR AGAINST IRAQ & CAPITALISM
[From the SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE]:
Politics a must for firms bidding to rebuild Iraq
Connections are fact of business for major construction companies
By David R. Baker
Even before Bechtel Corp. won a multimillion-dollar contract last week to rebuild Iraq, critics cried favoritism. They noted the firm's many White House ties, spanning several administrations, not to mention its generosity as a political donor.
The same, however, could be said of most every company considered for the Iraq job. Within the handful of construction firms capable of rebuilding an entire country, government connections are a fact of business. "Go down the list of every other company -- they're all connected," said Peter Singer, a Brookings Institution fellow and author of "Corporate Warriors" on the private military industry. That troubles many critics, who worry that in dealing with the same people in the same companies, the government may not get the least expensive, or most innovative, approach to its work.
OLD BOYS CLUB TOUGH TO ENTER
"It's an old boys network, and it's impossible for new boys to crack into it," said Christopher Hellman, a senior analyst at the Center for Defense Information think tank in Washington. "The reality is, you and I could form a construction company and bid on the Bechtel thing, but we're never going to win it. So it's hard to see that it's a competitive environment."
That said, Hellman said he doesn't know how to change the situation.
Smaller firms don't have much opportunity to amass the long track record the government demands on major construction projects. And those companies have every incentive to hire ex-government officials and employees who may know both the people in power and the procedures for getting federal work.
"To a certain extent, this stuff is self-perpetuating," Hellman said.
Complaints of favoritism even led Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, to call for an investigation of the process for picking firms to work in Iraq. The General Accounting Office reported last week that it will review the process. Bechtel, for its part, insists that its knack for landing big contracts comes from its experience and the quality of its work.
"We won this work on our record, plain and simple," Chief Executive Officer Riley Bechtel told employees in an e-mail message Friday. "We have a decades- long record of experience and performance on tough jobs under tough conditions, including the Kuwait oil fires and scores of other projects in the Middle East and around the world. It's a record that few, if any, companies in the world can match."
There are a few firms in the same echelon as Bechtel. The companies that have been vying for work in Iraq have sterling connections. Halliburton Co., which capped Iraqi oil well fires, has a former chief executive officer, Dick Cheney, now serving as America's vice president. Fluor Corp., which bid on the reconstruction job landed by Bechtel, has a former head of the National Security Agency and deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency on its board.
Bechtel has executives serving on President Bush's export council and the Defense Policy Board, an influential Pentagon advisory panel. George Shultz, Ronald Reagan's secretary of state, sits on its corporate board. Reagan's secretary of defense, Caspar Weinberger, was once the company's general counsel and served on its board of directors…
©2003 San Francisco Chronicle
25 protesters arrested at
Lockheed
Tuesday, April 22, 2003
Sunnyvale -- Police today arrested about 25 demonstrators protesting Lockheed Martin Space Systems for its alleged creation of weapons of mass destruction.
Some 150-200 activists marched to the plant about 7 a.m., formed human chains and blocked three access roads, causing a traffic jam.
Sunnyvale Police Capt. Greg Kevin said the demonstrators attempted to send their own civilian weapons inspectors in to the facility to search for WMD.
"They were unable to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but we found them right here in Sunnyvale," said protest organizer Blair Thedinger of Direct Action to Stop the War.
Sunnyvale is home to Lockheed's Space and Strategic Missiles facility, where the company builds spacecraft for military, civil government and international commercial markets.
But according to Direct Action, it is also where the weapons manufacturer builds the key tactical strike weapons used in the war in Iraq.
"(These are) weapons being used against the Iraqi people in an unjust, illegal an amoral U.S. invasion,'' said Shahrzad Broome, an Iranian-American Santa Clara University student. "To stop the war, we must stop the military-industrial complex driving the war."
Sunnyvale police, on the other hand, were more interested in stopping the roadblocks. One of the three access roads to Lockheed was open to traffic by 9:15 a.m.
[COMMENT: While applauding this action and calling for more, it must be pointed out that Direct Action is opposed to calls for Socialism (at least in the U.S.), substituting instead a defunct form of Liberal radicalism and pacifism. Additionally, Direct Action more or less functions as a Green Party front group and base for future Green and Democratic politicians.]
DECRIMINALIZE POT & PSCHEDELICS!
Family
court judge in Michigan refuses to allow 4-year-old to ingest peyote until
older
JAMES PRICHARD,
Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, April 22, 2003
©2003 Associated Press
(04-22) 12:01 PDT WHITE CLOUD, Mich. (AP) --
A family court judge ruled Tuesday that a 4-year-old boy cannot take peyote at American Indian spiritual ceremonies.
In his decision, Judge Graydon W. Dimkoff wrote that "peyote is dangerous, and in general should be avoided." He went on to state, however, that the boy could ingest peyote when he is fully aware of the implications, is physically and emotionally ready, and has the permission of both parents.
The boy's father, Jonathan Fowler, 36, a member of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, had asked Dimkoff to reverse an earlier decision and allow his son to ingest sacramental peyote with him at the Native American Church of the Morning Star.
Kristin Hanslovsky, Fowler's ex-wife, had fought the request, saying she did not want to violate anyone's religious freedom, but giving the boy peyote could cause long-term neurological defects.
Fowler's attorney, Thomas Myers, of Michigan Indian Legal Services, has said the case was about ensuring that "rights guaranteed to Native Americans by treaty or statute are secured, and I think that would include constitutional rights."
Peyote, a bitter-tasting cactus that grows in southern Texas and northern Mexico, has been a part of Indian culture for thousands of years. Those who ingest the plant -- usually drunk as a tea or eaten as a greenish paste -- believe it provides enlightenment and other spiritual and physical benefits.
The plant's active chemical ingredient is mescaline, a hallucinogen. The U.S. criminal code classifies peyote as a controlled substance, and in most instances a person caught with more than 4 ounces faces the possibility of a 20-year prison sentence.
But during the last century, peyote's use in religious rites spread among American Indians throughout the United States, including the upper Midwest. Congress recognized this sacramental use of peyote eight years ago by amending the American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 to protect the practice in all 50 states.
Testifying on Fowler's behalf at a court hearing last year, John H. Halpern, a psychiatrist at Harvard Medical School, said he has found no evidence of a child or adult being harmed by the use of peyote in Indian religious services.
"This is a sacred ceremony," said Halpern, who has conducted an extensive study of peyote use among Indians. "It's not something to entertain people."
About 300,000 Indians who belong to the Native American Church of North America, the nation's largest church for indigenous peoples, ingest some form of the cactus, Halpern said.
Some of the churches do not let young children ingest peyote, however. At the Peyote Way Church of God in Klondike, Ariz., a person must be at least 18 -- or 14, with parental permission -- to take the substance.
"Peyote is an introspective
experience," said church co-director Anne Zapf. "It's a God
experience and generally you have to have a few sins under your belt."
©2003
Associated Press
[See also, THE ONES MOTHER GIVES YOU...]
Proud, Gnostic
&
RED!
Continue EDITORIALS 2003
Back to PREVIOUS EDITORIALS
Updated 08/03