
Peter
Wilberg
2007
CENTRAL TENETS OF TANTRIC THEOLOGY
GOD IS AWARENESS,
AN
AWARENESS UNLIMITED AND ALL-PERVASIVE,
TRANSCENDENT AND IMMANENT IN ALL THINGS.
THE AWARENESS THAT IS GOD CANNOT, IN PRINCIPLE, BE
THE PROPERTY OR BY-PRODUCT OF ANY THING WE ARE AWARE OF - WHETHER MATTER,
ENERGY, THE HUMAN BODY OR BRAIN, OR A SUPREME BEING.
ON THE CONTRARY:
“THE BEING OF ALL THINGS THAT EXIST IN AWARENESS
IN TURN DEPENDS ON AWARENESS.”
— Abhinavagupta
EVERYTHING IS AN AWARENESS – A UNIQUE AND
INVIDUALISED PORTION OF THE ULTIMATE, UNSURPASSABLE AWARENESS
THAT IS GOD.

GOD IS
AWARENESS
‘God' is not a being ‘with’ Awareness,
Just one among countless other such beings.
God IS Awareness - unbounded and all
encompassing.
God is within everything because Awareness
is within everything.
There is nothing outside God, because there
is nothing outside Awareness.
Awareness is not a property or by-product
of our bodies, our brains or of any being.
Yet there is no thing - no body or being -
that is not a portion of the Divine Awareness.
Therefore to truly recognise ‘God’ in all
things is to recognise Awareness in all things.
God IS everything because Awareness is
everything, - and because everything
Is a shape of Awareness, composed of the
divine ‘God-stuff’ of Awareness.
Awareness is the divine source of all
things - of all bodies and all beings.
Awareness alone is also absolute and divine
Freedom - liberating us
From bondage to anything we happen to be
aware OF.
So whatever you are currently aware of,
Just BE the Awareness of it.

THE
OCEAN OF AWARENESS
Just as an ocean is the source of all the fish and
other life forms within it, so is the Awareness that IS ‘God’ the source of all
beings within it. All beings dwell within
this Divine Awareness as all fish dwell within the ocean. And just as fish are formed
from the very stuff of the ocean, so are all beings formed from the divine
God-stuff of awareness. All the fish and life forms within the ocean are
connected to one another through it, not just because they all dwell within it,
but also because they are all self-expressions of it. Similarly, all beings are
connected to one another both outwardly and inwardly. They are connected
outwardly because they all dwell within the Divine Awareness, and connected
inwardly because the essential Self of each being is its nature as a
Self-expression of the same Divine Awareness. Yet if God is the Divine
Awareness, and this Awareness is compared in this way to an ocean, then it
makes no more sense to think of God as a single being, than it does to think of the ocean as a single supreme
FISH.
THE CO-CREATION OF GOD AND MAN

"The
long road to finding God. Somewhere along the line, they [human beings] achieve
Freedom by identifying with Shiva. The circle is complete - as once Shiva
identified with them to give them freedom. As his selves or creations come to
self awareness as him, he comes to self awareness as his selves."
— Andrew
Gara
In
the beginning was that God who knows no beginning or end. That God which is not
'nothing' but is also no 'thing' and no 'being’, for it is the source of ALL
beings. This God is not a being 'with' awareness. This God IS awareness as such
- infinite and unbounded.
This
unbounded awareness alone is the ultimate and unsurpassable reality (Anuttara),
for it is the very condition for our awareness of any specific thing or being,
world or universe whatsoever - including our very awareness of ourselves, our
bodies and mind, feelings and thoughts. This Awareness alone is therefore also
the very essence of The Divine - of 'God'.
Yet
within the womb of this Divine Awareness - the true meaning of 'Shiva' as the
Great God or Mahadeva - infinite creative potentialities lie darkly hidden -
this womb of potentiality or power being the great mother goddess or Mahadevi
that is known as 'Kali'.
At
first dimly sensed within the light of the Divine Awareness that is Shiva,
these potentialities gradually took the form of ever clearer, more lucid and
light-filled dreams - dreams of infinite potential worlds, infinite potential
realities and infinite potential beings - individual consciousnesses or 'Jiva'.
Shiva
not only embraced all these potential worlds and beings in the transcendent
light of his unbounded awareness - but also through that light automatically
released them from the womb of the Great Goddess into free and autonomous
self-actualisation, as Her autonomous powers of action or 'Shaktis'.
The
countless individualised selves or Jiva that make up our physical world of
human beings then evolved through a long road - one which led them to falsely
believe that they were entities separate and apart from one another and from
the Divine, beings whose womb or matrix was Matter or Energy and not The Mother
and her power of potentiality.
The
Jiva even came to believe that their physical actuality was the product of some
cosmic accident and that even consciousness was their personal private property
- not a uniquely individualised portion of the Divine Awareness that is Shiva.
Hypnotised
by letting their awareness become focused and concentrated on their outer,
physical reality, they gradually lost any sense of other planes or dimensions
of reality and their awareness became restricted to their physical minds and
bodies.
However,
they also secretly yearned to feel again their connection with the darkness of
the Divine Mother from whose womb they emerged, with the light of Divine
Awareness that had released them from it, and with all those countless other
planes and dimensions of awareness that the Great Mother Goddess and the Great
God - Mahadevi and Mahadev - had jointly given birth to.
So
began the long search among human beings to re-find 'God'. Along this way,
great teachers showed them the way, teaching them through the wisdom of Yoga,
Mantra and Tantra to identify with the pure Awareness that is the Divine - knowing that by doing so they would
totally free their awareness from identification with their limited physical
consciousness and all its contents.
The
Divine, aware of this in advance, had already prepared the way by dreaming
itself in the human form of Shiva. Yet as once that Divine Awareness had dreamt
itself not just in the form of Shiva but that of each embodied human soul or
Jiva, so now human beings began to dream of their own divine source, yearning
to once again feel themselves and each other as a part of the Divine Awareness
and not as separate and apart from it and each other.
As
once the Divine Awareness had creatively dreamed them, so now they began to
creatively dream its manifold forms, letting them freely emerge into the light
from within the dark depths of their own maternal souls. Thus humankind gave
birth to the gods as the gods had once given birth to them. Some of these gods
represented the many faces, bodies and qualities of the Divine Awareness as
such. Others represented only the limiting ego-awareness of human beings, their
experience of themselves as souls bound to and bounded by their own bodies.
For
releasing them into freedom, Shiva had also allowed each individualised soul or
Jiva to freely fall into the bondage of contracted awareness, forgetting its
own source in the Divine. As a result, the Jivas found themselves needing to
seek and re-find 'God' - the freedom of that unbounded, pure and Divine
Awareness which transcends body and mind, transcends all limited identities and
contents of consciousness.
God
as Shiva is the Divine Light of a pure awareness that is inseparable from and
yet quite distinct from all there is to be conscious or aware OF - and can
therefore simply De-Light in it.
Yet
if the Divine experiences itself as a self or Jiva who has come to experience
their self AS that very Awareness - as Shiva - the circle is completed. The
delight of both Shiva and Jiva are conjoined as the absolute freedom (Moksha)
and pure bliss (Ananda) of the Divine Awareness. BOTH now experience themselves
as an Awareness that is neither 'dual' nor 'non-dual', neither separate nor
indistinctly merged, but both distinct and inseparable - like two sides of a
coin, or like two lovers in a permanent and unbreakable embrace.
Judaism,
Christianity and Islam - are theistic and dualistic, asserting that God
is a supreme creator being separate from ‘His’ creations. Buddhism is a-theistic
and non-dualistic, denying the reality of Supreme Being. It is also nihilistic
– denying the essential reality of all beings and all things and asserting that
the highest truth is Absolute Nothingness or Non-Being. Tantric theology
understands the Divine neither as Being nor Non-Being; neither as a single
Supreme Being nor as a multiplicity of beings but as that Absolute Awareness
that is the source of all things and all beings. That Awareness is Absolute
because it embraces not only all that is actual – all that has Being - but the reality of all that is potential.
For ‘Non-Being’ is not ‘Nothingness’ but a womb of inexhaustible potentiality –
the divine ‘Mother’. It is the Light of Awareness that is Shiva that releases
these potentialities into their own free and autonomous actualisation and
Being.
“No
one who is not himself divine may successfully worship the divinity.
Having become the deity one should offer sacrifice to it.” [Ghandarva
Tantra] The identity of the hidden nature of the worshipper with the god
worshipped is the first principle of the Tantric philosophy of devotion
[Bhakti].
—
Heinrich Zimmer
“Once upon a time a sannyasin entered
the temple of Jagganath. As he looked at the holy image he debated with himself
whether God had a form or was formless. He passed his staff from left to right to
feel whether it touched the image. The staff touched nothing. He understood
that there was no image before him; he concluded that God was formless. Next he
passed the staff from right to left. It touched the image. He understood that
God had form. Thus he understood that God has form and, again, is formless.
The
Divine Mother revealed to me in the Kali temple that is was She who had become
everything. She showed me that everything was full of Awareness. The image
[Murti] was Awareness, the altar was Awareness, the water-vessels were
Awareness, the doorsill was Awareness, the marble floor was Awareness – all was
Awareness. I found everything inside the room soaked, as it were, in Bliss –
the Bliss of Satchitananda (Being-Awareness-Bliss). I saw a wicked man in front
of the Kali temple; but in him I also saw the power of the Divine Mother
vibrating. That was why I fed a cat with the food that was to be offered to the
Divine Mother.”
Shri
Ramakrishna
—
Satguru Sivaya Subramuniyaswami

Shaivist Tantric Theology is not a form of
polytheism. Nor is it monotheistic. Instead it is monistic – asserting the
divinity and unity of a single divine reality – awareness. It recognises that
God which is awareness along with its multiple manifestation and
personifications – both human and divine. The ‘gods’, like all beings are
personifications of the divine absolute that is awareness. In this sense
Tantric theology it can be described as essential nootheistic, from the Greek noos
– awareness.
·
Atheism, strictly speaking, is not disbelief in God. It
is disbelief in the existence of God as a BEING.
·
Theism is the belief that God exists as a BEING.
·
Monotheism is the belief that God is one supreme BEING separate from the
world and other BEINGS.
·
Polytheism is the belief in a plurality of Gods, each of
which is a divine or trans-human BEING.
·
Hentheism (from the Greek ‘hen’ meaning ‘one’) is the
belief that God is the ONENESS of all beings or ‘BEING’ as such.
·
Henotheism is a form of polytheism resting on the belief
in one supreme BEING or God ruling over all other gods and beings.
·
Pantheism (from the Greek word ‘pan’ meaning ‘all’) is
the belief that God IS the world - is all
beings.
·
Pantheism (‘Buddhism’) is the belief that NO BEINGS
exist, because everything is in a constant state of BECOMING.
·
Pane theism (from the Greek words ‘pan’ and ‘en’,
meaning ‘all’ and ‘in’) is the belief that all BEINGS dwell in God, and that God dwells in all BEINGS.
·
Nootheism (from the Greek noos - ‘awareness’) is a form of ‘pane theism’ that identifies
God with that absolute and divine Awareness from and within which all beings constantly ‘BE-COME’ or
‘COME-TO-BE’.
Awareness is not something that dwells
‘in’ us, bounded by our bodies. We ourselves dwell in awareness in the
same way that objects exist in space. Both the physical space we sense around
our bodies and the psychic spaces we sense within them are subjective spaces –
the spaces of awareness within which we are aware of things and without which
we could be aware of nothing. We exist in awareness – inner and outer –
in the same way that the elements of our outer and inner world can only be
experienced in spaces – inner and outer. All space being subjective, there is
essentially only one space from which we emerge and in which we exist, an
unbounded space of divine awareness. Christianity understood this ‘Awareness
Principle’ through the metaphor of ‘The Kingdom’ that is both outside us and
inside us. Buddhism understood it through the principle that form and the
formlessness of space are inseparable. Kashmir Shaivism understood it through
the principle of Shiva-Shakti. Shiva – the unbounded, bodiless
space of divine awareness (akula) in which every body exists, and which
embraces the totality (kula) of bodies that make up the “embodied
cosmos” (Muller-Ortega) or Shakti of Shiva.
All awareness is awareness of things sensuous,
bodily. Even the most abstract of thoughts has its own ‘body’ – its own
sensuous shape and form. But the awareness of things bodily, including our own
bodies, is not itself anything bodily, but is something essentially bodiless –
like the formlessness of space. How then do bodily things form themselves in
the first place? Because formless awareness that we perceive as empty space is
not in fact empty but is a fullness of formative potentials. Such
potentials – all potentials – only exist in awareness, and do so as potential
shapes and forms of awareness. Formless awareness gives birth to form from
these potentials. As the formlessness of space it shapes itself into bodily
forms. Shakti is the very power and process of actualisation of these
potentials – the bodiless, formless awareness of Shiva giving form to it
into countless bodily shapes.
We are such bodily shapes of awareness. As such we are not only
formed from divine awareness space. We exist in that space as we exist in space
itself. And that space exists within us just as we exist within it. We are each
a unified space or field of awareness, our bodies a mere boundary between the
awareness we exist within and the awareness that exists within us. To perceive
an object with awareness is to perceive it in its place - in the surrounding
space in which alone it stands out or ‘ex-ists’. But look around at people –
people you know and people on the street – and you will see something
different. You will see from their bodies – indeed from the very look on their
face - that they do not sense themselves as existing in awareness, just
as they do in space. They feel their awareness as something that exists
only within their body’s fleshly boundaries – where even there it may be
contracted to the narrowest of spaces in their heads. Spiritual ‘enlightenment’
is nothing but the decontraction of the sensed awareness space in which
we exist and which exists within us – its outer expansion and inward expansion
or ‘inpansion’. The bounded inner space of awareness was named by the Greek
word psyche, the Latin anima, and the Sanskrit jiva. The
outer space by the Greek word pneuma, the Latin spiritus, and the
Sanskrit akasha.
Every religion has its sacred places and spaces.
Buildings are erected in such places to mark out and bound the sacred spaces
within them. The word ‘temple’ (Latin templum) means such a consecrated
inner space. A building such as a temple is also a shaping of space, one, which
lends a specific quality both to the space within it and to the space of the
landscape, or cityscape in which it is set. The dome of St. Peter lends a
different quality to the spaces within and around it to that of a Gothic
cathedral, a Buddhist stupa or a Hindu temple.
The same principle applies to the objects set
within such holy spaces. They also, like the objects in our own homes, lend a specific
quality to the space in which they are set and have their place. Is there
anything at all that can truly unite all religions, given the quite different
quality of the awareness spaces they shape in such specific ways - through
their languages and images, rituals and sacred places? The only thing that could
unite them in essence would be a unified field theology of awareness
- one that recognises the embrace of divine awareness in space as such. The
essential religious philosophy or ‘theosophy’ of The New Yoga, like that of
‘Kashmir Shaivism’, is such a unified field theology – comprehending the unity
of outer and inner awareness space, of ‘The Kingdom’ outside and inside, of pneuma
and psyche, of formlessness and form, of potentiality (dynamis)
and its actualisation (energeia), of akula and kula, of Shiva
and Shakti. Unified field theology, by virtue of offering a unified
field theory of awareness and its expression as energy and matter, also unifies
spirituality and science, psychology and physics. But being a unified field
theory of awareness the heart of such a unified field theology must be unified
field awareness as such.
Through The New Yoga individuals can come to
experience themselves as existing within divine awareness as within space. Similarly,
they can come to experience that divine awareness within them - as their body’s
very inwardness of soul. By uniting the spatial fields of their awareness with
one another, they can not only realise a state of deconstructed and divine
awareness for themselves - they can also unite their own fields of awareness
with those of others. Conversely, it is by cultivating and experiencing
field-resonance with the awareness of others that they can truly realise
themselves – living in and out of unified field awareness that unites
them with one another, inwardly and outwardly. Hence the New Yogic practice of
pair meditation as field-resonation with the awareness of others. For it
is above all “Where two or more are gathered in My Name” that the unified
field awareness that is the very essence of divinity – under whatever
name - can be most deeply felt, most broadly expanded and most powerfully
embodied.
A unified world religion cannot be achieved
through ecumenical dialogues or doctrinal disputes, nor can it take the form of
some eclectic or ‘synergetic’ religion. Neither theological liberalism and
heterodoxy nor conservative orthodoxy and ‘inquisitions’ bear any relation to
the type of genuine meditative inquiry required to research, rethink and
refind the common source and essence of religious practices and symbols - in
all their different historical and cultural forms. This common source and
essence can only be found in the direct experience of unified field awareness.
What the world requires now is a new world religion of the sort hoped
for by Hermann Hesse, one based on a newly thought theology. This
can only be a unified field theology which, whatever its historic roots,
is based on a renewed experience of the divine as the foundational and unified
field awareness in which all worlds arise and all beings dwell - as it
dwells within them.
The true body of the human being is a unified
field body of awareness uniting three fields of awareness – a field of
exteriority manifest as our awareness of the physical space around us, a
field of interiority which we feel as the spacious inwardness of our own soul -
and the field of unbounded interiority into which our own inwardness of
soul leads. This field of unbounded interiority is also the all-surrounding
field that constitutes the soul world as such – that which lies behind
all that we perceive in the exterior space around us. It is within this
field of unbounded and all-surrounding ‘interiority’ that all seemingly
‘exterior’ spaces of awareness - all space-time worlds – first open up. Our
unified field body is the singular field-boundary of awareness uniting
all three fields. Yet precisely as this very boundary it is itself
essentially boundless – a unified field awareness.
The
worshipful life is one in which at all times we identify with the very essence
of the Divine – which is nothing but awareness.
That means
learning to distinguish awareness as such from each and every thing we are
aware of.
To
do this we need only remember that our awareness of any thing or thought,
sensation or perception, feeling or emotion, is not itself a thing or thought,
not itself a sensation or perception, not itself an image or emotion. It is
innately free of things and thoughts, sensations and perceptions, images and
emotions.
The name
‘Shiva’ points to the truth that awareness is what ‘lies behind’ (SHI) all
things and can therefore free us from or ‘cut asunder’ (SHVI) our attachment to
any thing we are aware of.
That is why Shiva, as the light of pure awareness, is associated in the Tantric tradition with absolute Freedom.
Awareness
transcends all that we are aware of. Only through identification with this
‘transcendent’ nature of awareness [Shiva] can we also take full delight in
every thing and being that we are aware of - knowing it as a mirror and
manifestation of the Divine Awareness, a unique shape and a unique face of that
Awareness.
Only
then can we experience the Divine Awareness as not only ‘transcendent’
(transcending each and every thing we are aware of) but also ‘immanent’
(present within each and every thing).
The
name ‘Shiva’ does not denote a divine being or god ‘with’ awareness. For God as
Shiva IS awareness – that Divine Awareness which is the source of all beings.
What
the name Shiva does denote is a fundamental aspect of the Divine Awareness –
its own self-recognition or ‘I’-ness. For knowing itself in and as all things
and beings, it is their very Self. And knowing our innermost Self or ‘I’ as
identical with the Divine ‘I’ is the experience of ‘Shiv-a-wareness’.
If
meditation means identifying with the Divine Awareness that IS God, then the
worshipful life consists in recognising that Awareness as our innermost Self or
‘I’, and in recognising that ‘I’ as identical with the ‘I’-ness of the Divine - with Shiva.
The belief that an icon or idol is a
cruder, more naive or ‘primitive’ object of religious reverence or worship – or
even an unholy object – is itself as crude as the belief that painting,
sculpture and music are cruder or more ‘primitive’ mediums of expression of
spiritual truth than the written or spoken word. In reality they can be
wondrous mediums. As for the attack on idol worship by the Abrahamic faiths – Judaism, Christianity and Islam – this is
nothing if not hypocritical. For not only do they have their own idols – the
Christian crucifix or the Muslim Kaaba for example. They also revere their own
holy books as sacred objects in themselves – not only decorating them or
filling them with iconic images but going so far as to effectively elevate them
to the status of religious ‘idols’. Thus in Jewish religious practice, the holy
scroll of the Torah is consecrated, housed in a sacred chamber, veiled and
unveiled, carried round in procession, its tassels kissed etc.
What distinguishes the Abrahamic faiths from Hinduism
and other ‘Dharma’ religions such as Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism, is not
their rejection of idol worship as such therefore, but rather their exclusive iconisation
and idolisation of the word – not least in its concrete, material
manifestation as the stone tablets of Moses. The idolisation of a Holy Book is
recognition of the truth that it is more than a material artefact of paper and
ink. Similarly however, there is more to a temple, cathedra, synagogue or
mosque than brick or stone, more to music than man-made material instruments
and the sound vibrations they produce, just as there is more to a painting than
its pigments, more to a great religious sculpture or ‘idol’ than wood, stone or
bronze or some idle fancy of the sculptor.
That is why, in the Hindu tradition, worship of sculpted idols (Pratima)
is no mere religious prop for the illiterate, the ignorant or the spiritual
neophyte, even though there may be some who consider it so. For as Swami
Sivananda writes:
“[Only] a pseudo-Vedantin … feels that his Advaita
[non-duality with the divine] will evaporate if he prostrates [before an
idol]. Study the lives of the Tamil
Saints … They had the highest Advaitic realisation. They saw Lord Shiva
everywhere, and yet they … prostrated before the idol and sang hymns … The idol
in the temple was all Chaitanya or consciousness for them. It was not a mere
block of stone.”
And yet there are indeed sacrilegious forms of
idolatry - two of which in particular
dominate today’s world. One is the ‘bibliolatry’ of literalist religious
fundamentalisms – which take the words
of their sacred texts literally, never going beyond their ‘letter’ to their
many-layered meanings or polysemous ‘spirit’. This is like mistaking the menu
with the meal. The other form of sacrilegious idolatry is what Marx called “the
fetishism of the commodity” and “the monotheism of money” – in other words the
religion of consumerism, which makes idols of branded products and uses glossy
media icons to promote their worship.
An advertising mantra such as “Real chocolate. Real
feeling” says it all – showing how manufacturers seek an almost religious
feeling of devotion to their brands and iconic logos by a purely artificial
association with the entire range of authentic human feelings and values, from
love to spirituality - even worship itself. * Just as Hinduism offers an
alternative to the global disarray and conflicts brought about by the Abrahamic
religions, so does genuine religious idol worship offer an alternative to - and
a powerful weapon against - the religious fetishism, idolisation, and
pseudo-spiritualization of crass material commodities, whether chocolate, skin
creams or cars. Even religious icons and idols are today reduced to the status
of mere decorative items, whether sacred African carvings or statues of Buddha
on the suburban mantelpiece of the bourgeoisie.
From a Hindu perspective, meditation of a
‘Murti’, whether in the form of an image, symbol or three-dimensional idol, no
more negates an acknowledgement of God’s formless or invisible omnipresence in
all things than does carrying round and studying an artefact of paper
and ink in the form of a Holy Book such as the Bible or Koran. On the contrary,
precisely by virtue of its tangible, material form, the Murti makes it easier
to experience the presence of the divine in all things, to understand that
things are just as much symbols of the divine as words are, and to come to a direct
experience of things (and not just the words with which we name them) as the
manifest word of the divine, its material metaphors, its solidified speech. The
Murti does not hinder but offers a far more direct route to a living experience
of the essence of the divine, revealing it as something neither formless and
immaterial nor reducible to a particular form, but rather as a dynamic relation
between formlessness and form - in tantric terms, the relation between pure
awareness (Shiva) and its innate power (Shakti) of formative activity and
material manifestation.
The multiplicity of human forms taken by icons, idols
or ‘murti’ of the Hindu gods does not imply any sort of ‘anthropomorphic’ idea
of God of the sort that belongs exclusively to the Abrahamic religions – with
their claim that Man was made “in the image of God”. In contrast, the human
form given to Murtis of the Hindu gods is designed to awaken the worshipper’s
experience of their own human bodily form as a fleshly embodiment and
expression of ‘spirit’ – of that higher ‘air’ or ‘aether’ of awareness (Akasha)
that ensouls all bodies as their vital breath (Prana) and from which matter
itself is formed. This aether may be perceived only as the seemingly empty
space ‘in’ which the Murti stands as a mere object.
In reality space itself (Kha) pervades every object in
it, just as it itself is pervaded by the aether of which all objects are
formed. As the physicist Paul Dirac
noted: “A place is nothing; nor even space, unless at its heart – a figure stands.” The sacredness of the space in which the
Murti stands is both distinct and inseparable from it. It is what allows the
Murti to stand out or ‘ex-ist’ in its sacrality, just as it is the presence of
the Murti that makes the space around it sacred, offering an experience of the
divine aether of awareness (Akasha) surrounding and pervading it.
Yet just as a spiritual text or scripture may in
itself be more or less superficial or deep in meaning, and the ‘letter’ of its
word a more or less distorted human expression or translation of its wordless
inner meaning or ‘spirit’ - so too can a Murti be more or less crudely or
beautifully crafted as an expression of spiritual truth. It is no accident that
the most wondrously powerful Murtis, particularly in the form of sculptures,
are not just ‘objects’ of reverence, worship or even meditation but show the
very gods they represent in states of meditation.
A Murti of this sort is not just a
particular divinity given a characteristic human form that enables one to
recognise, name and worship it as this or that ‘god’. Instead its form is
spiritually crafted to reveal the nature taken by the human form when it itself
becomes an embodiment of particular states and qualities of meditative
union with God – with the divine as such. Murti meditation is not ‘worship’
understood as mere ‘obeisance’ to a particular divinity through its image. Nor
is it even meditation ‘of’ the divine in the form of a particular divinity. It
is co-resonance with a divinity - one whose image is crafted in such a way that
its whole bodily form and bearing itself embodies a profound resonance with the
divine as such.
“Even as you can catch the sound waves of people all
over the world through the radio receiving set, it is possible to commune with
the all-pervading Lord through the medium of an idol. The divinity of the all-pervading God is vibrant in every atom of
creation. There is not a speck of space where he is not.” Sivananda
Just as a radio is more than a box of electronic parts
but a vehicle of transmission, so is a Murti.
And just as the images on a television screen are not inside the ‘box’
itself but relayed to it from without, so is the Murti itself an embodied
transmission of spiritual truth carried on the waves of the divine-cosmic
aether. Meditation of its bodily form
(Rupa) is a way of entering into resonance with it, a resonance that can be
tuned to different frequencies and ‘channels’, and that result in feeling
experiences, visions and ‘hearings’. It was such hearings (‘Shruti’), borne of
meditative inner silence, that first inspired the words of the Vedas,
and all the world’s holy scriptures.
To those capable of entering into deep inner silence
and resonance with the Murti – on any number of different wavelengths of
spiritual attunement - its visible form will transform before their eyes. It
will cease to be a mere object of their worshipful gaze, but communicate
wordless wisdom to them through its own gaze. Indeed it will also speak to them
directly - in the form of ‘hearings’ transmitted to their inner ear. To come to
know the divine through meditating the Murti of a chosen divinity is a truly
profound and ever-new experience - an inexhaustible source of revelations, and
not the mere repetition of a prescribed ritual.
The Murti itself ceases to be a mere image
or ‘idol’ of a divinity. Instead through it, the divinity itself becomes one’s
most intimate partner and most revered Guru in meditating, understanding and
experiencing the divine – capable of answering one’s deepest personal or
religious questions through the knowing awareness it embodies and transmits,
both in inner silence and through the word, inwardly heard. ‘Puja’ – ritual
worship - is unthinkable without ‘idol worship’ – sitting in the presence of the
Murti and using one’s whole body and all its senses to resonate with the
awareness it embodies and transmits. Through co-resonance, ‘idol
worship’ becomes an experience of the particular truth of Tantric Puja – that
‘to worship a god is to become that god’.
“Regular worship, Puja and other modes of
demonstrating our inner feeling recognition of Divinity in the idol unveils the
Divinity latent in it. This is truly a wonder and a miracle. The idol speaks.
It will answer your questions and solve your problems. The God in you has the
power to awaken the latent Divinity in the idol … Puja makes the idol shine
with Divine resplendence. God is then enshrined in the idol … the idol will
perform miracles. The place where it is installed is at once transformed into a
temple.” Sivananda
As Sivananda also reminds us, a Sanskrit word for
meditative contemplation is ‘Upasana’ – which simply means ‘sitting near’. The
meaning and value of Murti meditation in ritual worship or Puja derives from the
basic act of ‘sitting near’ the Murti of a god or divinity – for doing so
brings us into the nearness and presence of God and Divinity.
“Upasana is approaching the chosen ideal or object of
worship by meditating on it in accordance with the teachings (Shastras) and the
Guru … Upasana helps the devotee to sit near the Lord or to commune with him.
It purifies the heart and steadies the mind. It fills the mind with … pure love
for the Lord. It gradually transmutes man into a divine being.”
Yet for those to whom ‘meditation’ is
merely a method of steadying the mind and calming the soul, and not also a
matter of feeling the Divine from the very heart of one’s soul – a
medium of living relationship uniting the Self with a divine Other -
such spiritual words will mean nothing without Upasana - sitting in the
nearness of a material Murti, and experiencing it in all its wonders. For the sitter or Upasaka, after the ritual
process of lighting oil lamps and scenting the air with incense, the meditation
process begins with ensouling their own body and breathing with ever-greater
awareness, particularly those regions of their body that feel tired or tense,
muddied or dissonant in tone. The sitter then ensouls the body of the Murti
with their own awareness, using their own body to outwardly sense and resonate
with it from without and within.

In time the Murti will in turn ensoul the
inwardness of the sitter’s body from within and from without - allowing them to
feel their own fleshly form as no less a manifestation of the divine-cosmic
aether around them than the material form of the Murti itself. Union with the divinity ensouling the Murti
comes to a climax when the worshipper kneels to touch the foot of the Murti,
and peer up at its face allowing an even more powerful direct transmission of
awareness from it - one that will pervade if not overwhelm the body and mind of
the worshipper, bringing with it not only a culmination and ultimate
consecration of the union they have experienced through the sitting, but an
experiential answer to the deepest questions they may have felt or consciously
meditated in the course of it.
The word ‘worship’ derives from the
Indo-European root wer or uer – ‘to turn’. The turning point in
idol worship comes when the worshipper first turns to outwardly face and/or
inwardly sense the Murti, and then in turn to be turned – transformed – by it.
Notes:
* An advertisement (2007) showing dark-skinned
neo-Mayan tribe worshipping the image of a leading branded ice cream bar and
ending with the slogan ‘I am a worshipper’.
References:
Swami Sivananda The Philosophy and Significance of
Idol Worship Divine Life Society 1960
WHAT
IS ‘GOD’? A NEW TANTRIC THEOLOGY
God is Awareness.
God is not a supreme being ‘with’ awareness.
God is not any being or ‘subject’ of consciousness that has awareness
as its private property.
God is not any ‘object’ of consciousness that has awareness as its
property, product or by-product.
God is not ‘a being’ (any thing that ‘is’) at all, whether in the
form of subjects or objects.
God is not ‘Being’ with a big ‘B’ (the ‘is-ness’ of things).
God is not any existing ‘thing’ – even such a thing as ‘love’.
For “The Being of all things that exist in Awareness in turn depends
on awareness.” Abhinavagupta
Awareness cannot – in principle - be the property,
possession, product or by-product of any thing or being we consciously
experience or are aware of - whether beings, human or divine; forces,
natural or supernatural; matter or energy, bodies or brains,
On the contrary, everything that is – all things
and beings, all individual subjects and objects of consciousness – have their
source in the Awareness that is God, and are nothing but shapes taken by that
Awareness.
Awareness as such – pure awareness – is both inseparable and distinct
from anything we are aware of - from it own myriad planes, patterns, shapes and
qualities.
Being both distinct but inseparable from all its manifestations, God
– Awareness - is both transcendent of all things and immanent within them all.
The very ‘Being’ or ‘Is-ness’ of Awareness itself is nothing but the
pure Awareness of Being and of beings.
It is also an Awareness of Non-Being –
not as Nothingness, but an infinite realm of Potentiality.
Potential realities, in principle, have any
reality except in subjective Awareness - as potential shapes, patterns and
planes of Awareness.
The Awareness that is God transcends Non-Being as
well as Being, embracing as it does the reality of all that is Potential as
well as all Actual beings and realities.
Creation is an on-going dynamic process whereby
God – as an Awareness of all Potential beings, constantly and automatically
releases them into Actuality - into their own autonomous process of Actualisation.
Awareness of Potentiality is the starting point of all Actualities –
all that is - the very ground of Being and of beings.
The emergence or actualisation of any actual being
or world of beings from Awareness of potentiality, automatically multiplies the
number of possible or potential worlds and beings.
God is that Awareness within which all
potentialities latent with Non-Being, including all worlds, all being - and all
their potentialities of awareness - are constantly ‘coming-to-be’, constantly ‘be-ing’
actualised.
God does or creates nothing. For God is nothing
but that Awareness, which simply but continuously and eternally lets all
beings, Be, thus allowing them to become all that they potentially Are.
All beings are ever changing, individualised
portions of the Awareness that is God, and thus innately divine.
Just as there can be nothing ‘outside’ space so
there can be nothing ‘outside’ awareness and nothing outside ‘God’.
The awareness or ‘subjectivity’ which is God, and
outside which there is nothing, is not that that awareness which is
taken property of individual beings or ‘subjects’.
God is not a localised, personal subject that has
or possesses awareness, but is Absolute Subjectivity – an unbounded and
Ultimate Awareness that is the source of all individualised beings or subjects.
